CHAPTER 20: COMMUNITIES We've been talking about "societies," which are A FAIRLY LARGE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN THE SAME TERRITORY, ARE RELATIVELY INDEPENDENT OF PEOPLE OUTSIDE THEIR AREA, AND PARTICIPATE IN A COMMON CULTURE. Examples: The US, NIU, Dekalb, prisons (societies of citizens, students, residents, prisoners). COMMUNITY is a subcategory of societies.. a Community is: A SPATIAL OR TERRITORIAL UNIT OF SOCIAL ORGANIZATION IN WHICH PEOPLE HAVE A SENSE OF IDENTITY AND A FEELING OF BELONGING. "Societies" are generally distinguished by abstract stuff and are broadly defined. Communities are more precise groups of people, and we normally associate them with sharing a physical space where we live and co-exist together in daily life. Common examples include cities, towns, or villages. Communities are places where we go about our day-to-day lives. Early communities were SUBSTENCE-oriented. That is, people did the basic stuff for survival (hunting, shelter, child-rearing). As life became more complex, so did cities. DIVISION OF LABOR / PERMANENCE / CHANGE As people became less dependent on nature and learned to cultivate herds and crops, communities became more perman ent. Beginning about 10,000 BC, permanent settlements free f rom dependence on crop cultivation emerged, but they were not actually cities. PREINDUSTRIAL CITIES WERE SMALL. WHY? 1. Relied on animal power as source of enery for economic production, which limited ability to alter the environment 2. Modest levels of surplas kept population down (50-90 farmers required to support a SINGLE city resident 3. Problems intransportation and food storage 4. Hardships of migration to city...(long time to get there and not much to do once there) 5. Dangers of cities (health, fire, etc) Industrial cities--as manufacturing grew, centralization increased. With this, came secondary occupations--traders, cart and ship builders, artists, etc---cities could support more because of tech changes (food storage, plow, etc) How did cities grow?? Various theories: 1. Concentric zone theory (chicago school view) 2. Sector theory: Build along transportation routes and grew outward---Concen. zone theory didn't really address this Cities developed outward, but not "concentrically," but rather in "zones" of industry, housing, etc.... 3. Multiple-Nuclei theory: Not a central focal point from which growth radiates, but multiple points (see chrt pp 507 for graphic description). Problems of contemporary cities: 1. Unequal development 2. Continual need to replace infrastructure 3. Over population (density) 4. Health and care of population 5. "social disorganization" 6. Congestion/need for more space (traffic, administration) 7. Urban/suburban and urban/rural split 8. Increasing difficulty in mediating competing groups Are there solutions?? 1. Better planning 2. Recogition of infrastructure needs (eg, Chicago) 3. Recognition of interdependancy between cities and environment (ecology, non-cities, etc)
Page maintained by: Jim Thomas - jthomas@sun.soci.niu.edu