SCHAEFER, CHAPTER 5: Social Interaction and Social Structure
Schaeffer begins this chapter by describing the Zimbardo experiment
(explain)
--people TOOK ON the roles they were assigned
--they become "real" for them
From Chapter 4, we learned that interaction is how we exchange meanings.
Book Def: Interaction "refers to the ways in which people respond to
to one another, whether face to face or over the telephone or over
the computer, or any place else they can communicate (letters).
We define our social reality in many ways
SOCIAL STRUCTURE: The predictable relationships that emerge from our
interaction, from our norms, and from our institutions.
An INSTITUTION is a highly regulated and predictable set of social practices
that guide social and cultural practices (eg, marriage, religion, education)
DEFINITION: SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS ARE ORGANIZED PATTERNS OF
BEHAVIORS CENTERED AROUND BASIC SOCIAL NEEDS.
WHAT HOLDS IT TOGETHER?
One way we define our world, hold it togetheri
and act upon it is by sorting out statuses of various kinds.
STATUS: STATUS, FOR SOCIOLOGISTS, REFRS TO ANY OF THE FULL RANGE
OF SOCIALLY DEFINED POSITIONS WITHIN A LARGE GROUP OR SOCIETY, FROM
THE LOWEST TO THE HIGHEST POSITION. ONE CAN BE PRESIDENT, STUDENT,
FARMER, ORMOVIE STAR. PEOPLE HOLD MORE THAN ONE STATUS SIMULTANEOUSY
1. ASCRIBED STATUS: ASSIGNED TO PEOPLE "BY SOCIETY,
REGARD FOR INDIVIDUAL'S UNIQUE TALENTS OR QUALITIES
SUCH AS - WOMAN, RACE, SIZE).
2. ACHIEVED STATUS, ON THE OTHER HAND, IS EARNED BY
EFFORTS. (STUDENT, CROOK, PROFESSOR, MOVIE STAR).
3. MASTER STATUS: A status that dominates other statuses.
An athlete (Magic Johnson) now has status as an AIDS
victim. AIDS VICTIM status dominates the athelete status.
DEFINITION: SOCIAL ROLE: A SOCIAL ROLE IS A SET OF EXPECTATIONS FOR
INDIVIDUALS WHO OCCUPY A GIVEN SOCIAL POSITION OR STATUS.
We expect THAT CAB DRIVERS KNOW THE CITY, THAT PROFESSORS KNOW THEIR
material, etc.
COMPLEMENTARY ROLES: WHEN OUR ROLE REQUIRES AT LEAST ONE
OTHER FULFILL IT. THUS, PROFESSOR/STUDENT, POLICE/CROOKS, BARTENNDERS
REQUIRES OTHERS.
Parents have competing roles (spouse, father, etc)
ROLE AMBIGUITY: WHEN WE AREN'T CERTAIN ABOUT OUR ROLES.
THE SOCIAL POSITION/EXPECTATIONS NOT CLEAR. (EG, PROF AT A P
NAME AT PART, FORMAL LATER).
ROLE STRAIN: Difficulties that result from the differing demands
and expectations associated with the same social position
ROLE CONFLICT: Incompatible expecations (father/coach; athlete/friends).
ROLE EXITS: The process of disengaging from a role. Some see four
basic stages (1) doubt; (2) search for alternatives; (3) action
stage or departure; (4) creation of new identity.
NOW, THIS OCCURS IN GROUPS!
GROUP: ANY NUMER OF PERSONS WITH SIMILAR VALUES AND EXPECTATIONS WHO
REGULARLY AND CONSCIOUSLY INTERACT (EG, STUDENT, TEACHERS).
GROUPS FORM SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS: MASS MEDIA, GOVERNMENT,
EDUCATION, CHURCH, FAMILY ARE ALLEXAMPLES OF A SOCIAL INSTITION
WE CALL A NUMBER OF GROUPS A SOCIETY. A SOCIETY IS A FAIRLY LARGE
GROUP OF PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN THE SAME TERRITORY AND ARE RELATIVELY
INDEPENDENT OF PEOPLE OUTSIDE THEIR AREA, AND WHO PARTICIPATE IN A
COMMON CULTURE. (NOTE: US SOCIETY, STUDENT SOCIETY, ETC).
SOCIETIES GIVE RISE TO A SOCIAL STRUCTURE, WHICH IS SIMPLY
A PATTERN OF THE ORGNIZATION OF A SOCIETY INTO PREDICTABLE
RELATIONSHIPS.
THREE VIEWS:
1. FUNCTIONALISTS: UNDERSTAND (OR EXAMINE) SOCIETY BY
THEY FUNCTION, THAT IS, HOW THEY DEVELOP ADAPTIVE
FOR PERPETUATING THE SOCIETY. PARSONS CONTENDS THAT
SYSTEMS, INCLUDING EVEN THE MOST COMPLEX OF SOCIETIES
PERFORM ALL FOUR OF THE FOLLOWING FUNCTIONS:
a. ADAPTATION TO THE ENVIRONMENT (IE, CREATING MECHA
STRATEGIES TO ENABLE SOCIETIES OR GROUPS TO REACT
WHICH MAY BE DISRUPTIVE, SUCH AS NEW TECHNOLOGY, FAM
b. GOAL ATTAIN MENT, IN THAT SOCIETIES DEFINE GOALS AND
FOR ATTAINING THESE GOALS, AND ALSO DIRECT ACTIVITY
RESOURCES (EG, LABOR, NEW FORMS OF SOCIAL ORGANIZATI
THESE GOALS.
c. INTEGRATION IS MET BY COORDINATING EACH OF THE INDIVIDUAL
OF A SOCIAL SYSTEM INTO A SMOOTHLY FUNCTIONING SINGLE SYSTEM
d. MAINTENANCE-- THIS MEANS THAT SOCIETIES INSURE THAT,
THE SYSTEM WILL BE ABLE TO MAINTAIN AND PERPETUATE ITSELF
2. CONFLICT VIEW: WE SHOULD STUDY SOCIETY/SOCIAL STR
LOOKING AT HOW POWER IS DISTRIBUTED, HOW DECISIONS
ETC. IN THIS VIEW, POWER IS EVERYWHER, ETC. CONFLICTS
ARE GUIDED BY THE HOBBESIAN VIEW THAT DEFINITIONS OF
VALUES ARE ALSO A SOURCE OF CONFLICT OVER WHO HAS TO
NAME THE WORLD (E.G., AS IN CREATION OF LAWS AND CON
"JUSTICE." IN THIS VIEW, THE STATE MEDIATES (OR INTE
H
THE INTENTION OF SOLVING) THE CONFLICTS OVER THESE
S
OF ACCEPTABLE AND UNACCEPTABLE BEHVIORS. AS A CONSE
T
ONLY BEHAVIOR, BUT ALSO .US POWER RELATIONS BECOME
TOPICS TO STUDY. UNLIKE THE FUNCTIONALIST (OR "CO
VIEW OF SOCIETY, WHICH VIEWS HARMONY AS THE BASIS
CONFLICT THEORISTS SEE CONFLICT AS THE NATURAL STATBLE
EXISTENCE.
CHAMBLISS AND SEIDMAN HAVE SUMMARIZED CONFLICT
FOUR PROPOSITIONS:
1. SOCIETY AT EVERY MOMENT IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE
AND CHANGE IS CONTINUOUS.
2. EVERY SOCIETY EXPERIENCES AT EVERY MOMENT EXPERIENCES
CONFLICTS.
3. EVERY ELEMENT IN A SOCIETY CONTRIBUTES TO CHANGE
4. EVERY SOCIETY RESTS UPON CONSTRAINT OF SOME OVER
OTHERS.
3. INTERACTIONISTS: HOW PEOPLE PUT THEIR WORLD TOGETHE
ON MEANING OF EVENTS, LANGUAGE, BEHAVIOR, FOR INDIVI
HOW THEY EXPERIENCE IT, AND IN TURN ACT MEANINGFULL
SOCIAL STRUCTURE. FOCUS IS ON SOCIAL ORDER TH
INTERACTION.
SUM THESE THREE, EMPHASIZE DIFFERENT QUESTIONS THEY
TWO USEFUL TERMS:
GEMEINSCHAFT: (TONNIES)---A SOCIETY HELD TOGETHER
BY PERSONAL BONDS (EG, STUDENTS, RURAL COMMUNITIES,
ETC)---PEOPLE SHARE MUCH.
GESELLSCHAFT: (TONNIES)---CHARACTERIZED BY LARGE
COMMUNITIES, LARGE, IMPERSONAL, LITTLE COMMITMENT TO OTHERS
OR CONSENSUS ON VALUES, NORMS.
CORRESPONDS TO DURKHEIM'S:
(1) ORGANIC SOLIDARITY (COMPLEX DIV OF LABOR, ETC)
(2) MECHANICAL SOLIDARITY (PRIMITIVE SOCIETIES)
Return to JT's homepage
Page maintained by: Jim Thomas - jthomas@sun.soci.niu.edu