DIFFERENTIAL OPPORTUNITY (associated with Cloward and Ohlin) Cloward and Ohlin are influenced by Merton, but differ somewhat: Transmission of criminal culture occurs in organized slums which provide the structure of illigitimate opportunity for success They identify emergence of new subcultures outside of "consensus" of lower class (contra Miller) (eg, gangs) Deviancy for them is seen as collective (with exception of retreatism) They look at ways in which self-blame may be neutralized CLoward and Ohlin (1959) previously argued that Merton's anomie theory was inadequte because it looked at the dissociation between culturally-prescribed goals and LEGITIMATE social means. THis assumed, said Cloward, that access to ILLEGITIMATE means was more-or-less EQUALLY DISTRIBUTED throughout geographic areas. So Cloward and Ohlin attempted to refine the tradition of strain theory. From MERTON (and Like COHEN) theysaw STRAIN as the outcome of blocked access to socially-defined goals, and STRAIN contributed to the genesis of delinquent subcultures. BUT unlike MERTON and other DIFFERENTIAL OPPORTUNITY theoriests, theyargued that access toillegitimate roles (as opposed to legitimate roles) not freely available to all. They suggested that the CHICAGO TRADITION implicitely recognized in their theories of SOCIAL DISORGANIZATION that illegal activities not available to all (they cite Sutherland's PROFESSIONAL THIEF" work in which "amateurs" quickly land in jail)--- They suggested that is, in a particular sub-culture,there are not role models, or no access to illegal means available, a delinquent sbuculture among adolescent will not devlop. Threee forms of response patterns to strains they identified: illegitimate response = delinquency--takes the form of criminal apprenticeships, etc retreatist (drugs, etc) CONFLICT SUBCULTURE (eg, fighting gangs)--(or POLTICAL ACTION gangs)
Page maintained by: Jim Thomas - jthomas@math.niu.edu