CHAPTER 10: INCARCERATION

Links to the past: Prisons have undergone lots of changes. We have already looked at various models (see history discussion). John Irwin has identified three (3) basic models in this century: THE BIG HOUSE: convicts lived and constructed a world with social divisions, lots of stratification and special informal rules and meanings, and their own set of enterprises. CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS: ESPECIALLY AFTER WW II: BASIC PREMISE WAS "RE-HAB," AND THAT "HUMAN NATURE" CAN BE "TREATED." CONTEMPORARY PRISONS: CHARACTERIZED BY "DRIFT," WAREHOUSING, "LOCK-EM UP," NO REHAB, BUT MANY PROGRAMS STILL IN PLACE. THE POINT: WE MUST UNDERSTAND EXACTLY WHAT WE INTEND TO ACCOMPLISH BY IMPRISONMENT AND WHAT HAPPENS IN PRISON, AND WE MUST STOP DOING ALL THE UNNECESSARY THINGS THAT DEGRADE, EMBITTER, CRIPPLE AND DEHUMANIZE PRISONERS. GOALS OF INCARCERATION: CUSTODIAL MODEL: (TODAY'S): EMPHASIZES SECURITY, DISCIPLINE AND ORDER. REHABILIATION MODEL: EMPHASIZES TREATMENT AND REFORM REINTEGRATION MODEL: EMPHASIZES OFFENDER'S TIES TO FAMILY AND COMMUNITY AS METHOD OF REFORM, AND ATTEMPTS TO DEVELOP STRATEGIES TO FACILITE RE-ENTRY INTO SOCIETY. NOTE: EACH OF THESE "MODELS" (OR GOALS) MAY NOT ALWAYS CORRESPOND TO MODELS OF PRISON OR PRISON MANAGEMENT. (DISCUSS TENSIONS/CONTRADICTIONS) The text reminds us that there are two gov't divisions of prisons in the US: 1. The Federal Bureau of Prisons (created in 1930 by Congress). In Illinois, we have three: Pekin (central); Greenville (south/central) and Marion (South) 2. State prisons: Disparate NOTE: FOR FUN (a good essay for the midterm): Compare federal and state prisons (use homepages) CURRENTLY, IT HAS BEEN RECOGNIZED THAT THE ARCHITECTURE OF PRISONS MAY ALSO CORRESPOND TO EITHER OUR GOALS OF ADMINISTRATION OR OUR PHILOSOPHIES OF PUNISHMENT. A) RADIAL DESIGN B) AUBURN PRISON C) TELEPHONE POLE DESIGN D) COURTYARD STYLE E) CAMPUS STYLE (MINIMUM/DWIGHT) F) PANOPTICON (STATEVILLE, BUT CHANGING) PRIVATE PRISONS ARE A NEW CONCEPT: (DISCUSS) KNOW THE TRENDS AND THE VARIOUS INCARCERATION STRATEGIES: (These are scattered, so we'll combine now): 1. NULL STRATEGY: "NOTHING SHOULD BE DONE, PRISONS ALLOWED TO BECOME CONGESTED. "SERVES THEM RIGHT," IS THE ETHOS. POLITICALLY POPULAR BECAUSE IT COSTS LITTLE. 2. SELECTIVE INCAPACITATION STRATEGY: MAKE OPTIMUM USE OF EXPENSIVE AND LIMITD PRISON SPACE BY TARGETTING FOR INCARCERATION THOSE WHOSE INCAPACITATION WILL DO THE MOST TO REDUCE CRIME. 3. POPULATION REDUCTION STRATEGY: REDUCE NEW ADMISSIONS BY DEVELOPING ALTERNATIVES TO PRISON. 4. POPULATION-SENSITIVE FLOW-CONTROL STRATEGY: LINKING SENTENCING TO AVAILABLITY OF PRISON SPACE, RELEASE PRISONERS WHEN PRISONS ARE CROWDED, ETC. 5. CONSTRUCTION STRATEGY: MORE PRISONS TO CONTAIN CROOKS. WHO IS IN PRISON? (p. 240-41) Elderly = over 10 pct Violent = 46.6 pct; property about 1/4; drugs, 21.3; Race: White= 35 pct; Hispanic=17 pct; black=46 pct HIV positive= 2.3 pct

<--Return to JT's 388 homepage

Page maintained by: Jim Thomas - jthomas@sun.soci.niu.edu