CHAPTER 5: Law of Corrections
Prisoners can sue their keepers.
Why? Because prisoners have rights.
Know terms:
--Constitution
--Statutes
--case law
--Regulations
--prison policies
--hands-off
--equal protection
--sex/gender
The term PRISONERS RIGHTS refers to those civil and related
rights prisoners retain as members of our society. Although the
prisoners rights is relatively recent, emerging only in the
1960s, the roots go back to the the mid-19th century, beginning
with the 14th amendment. The relevant language of the 14th
amendment holds that:
No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person
of life, liberty, or property, without due process of
law nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the
equal protection of the laws [emphasis added].
At the same time, Congress passed a civil rights act [Title 42
U.S.C. [Section] 1983), which provides the basis for contemporary
prisoner rights. Although modified and renewed several
times between 1866-1877, the relevant language of the original
civil rights legislation today remains essentially unchanged:
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance,
regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or
Territory, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any
citizen of the United States or other person within the
jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights,
privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution
and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an
action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding
for redress.
Prisoners have expanded their rights by filing civil rights suits
under Section 1983. Contrary to critics, who claim that prisoners
file suits simply to get out of prison, in 1987, the bulk (70%)
of all prisoners' suits are civil rights suits.
In 1961, the Warren Court also handed down its landmark decision in
Monroe v. Pape (365 U.S. 167, 1961),
which resurrected nineteenth century civil rights legislation and provided
the legislative justification for redressing state civil rights complaints
in federal courts. A few years later, a federal appellate court
extended to prisoners the First Amendment right to freely exercise their
religion when it recognized the legitimacy of Black Muslims
(Cooper v. Pate, 382 F.2d 518, 7th Circuit, 1967). (explain why dates differ)
More importantly, the Cooper decision for the first time explicitly allowed
state prisoners to file federal litigation under the Civil Rights Act.
Some quickie terms:
Prisoner Litigation: Suits filed by state or federal prisoners
in federal courts that either challenge their continued confinement
or challenge prison conditions or policies.
Types of Files: 1) HABEAS CORPUS: These are "let me out of here"
petitions
2) CIVIL RIGHTS: These are "clean this place up" complaints
Cause of Action: The reason that prisoners file. The primary
reasons for civil rights suits:
Internal Policies (28%)
Original Case (19%)
Violence (18%)
Conditions (16%)
Bill of Rights (8%)
External Policies (6%)
Other (5%)
Reasons for the EXPANSION of prisoner litigation:
1) Civil rights struggles
2) changing notion of rights
3) public awareness of conditions
4) Black Muslims
5) External support groups
6) increased literacy of prisoners
7) Jailhouse lawyers
Underlying rationale
1) punishment must be "least restrictive"
2) Rules are ok if there is a compelling state interest
3) Rules/policies/punishments are fine if there is clear and
present danger
Consequences of Litigation:
1) Social
2) Judicial
3) Prison administration
4) Prison existence
Alternatives
1) Ombudsman
2) Grievance councils/procedures
3) Mediation
4) Fewer prisons and prisoners
5) More emphasis on scaled sentences
Page maintained by: Jim Thomas - jthomas@math.niu.edu