CHAPTER 5: Law of Corrections Prisoners can sue their keepers. Why? Because prisoners have rights. Know terms: --Constitution --Statutes --case law --Regulations --prison policies --hands-off --equal protection --sex/gender The term PRISONERS RIGHTS refers to those civil and related rights prisoners retain as members of our society. Although the prisoners rights is relatively recent, emerging only in the 1960s, the roots go back to the the mid-19th century, beginning with the 14th amendment. The relevant language of the 14th amendment holds that: No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws [emphasis added]. At the same time, Congress passed a civil rights act [Title 42 U.S.C. [Section] 1983), which provides the basis for contemporary prisoner rights. Although modified and renewed several times between 1866-1877, the relevant language of the original civil rights legislation today remains essentially unchanged: Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress. Prisoners have expanded their rights by filing civil rights suits under Section 1983. Contrary to critics, who claim that prisoners file suits simply to get out of prison, in 1987, the bulk (70%) of all prisoners' suits are civil rights suits. In 1961, the Warren Court also handed down its landmark decision in Monroe v. Pape (365 U.S. 167, 1961), which resurrected nineteenth century civil rights legislation and provided the legislative justification for redressing state civil rights complaints in federal courts. A few years later, a federal appellate court extended to prisoners the First Amendment right to freely exercise their religion when it recognized the legitimacy of Black Muslims (Cooper v. Pate, 382 F.2d 518, 7th Circuit, 1967). (explain why dates differ) More importantly, the Cooper decision for the first time explicitly allowed state prisoners to file federal litigation under the Civil Rights Act. Some quickie terms: Prisoner Litigation: Suits filed by state or federal prisoners in federal courts that either challenge their continued confinement or challenge prison conditions or policies. Types of Files: 1) HABEAS CORPUS: These are "let me out of here" petitions 2) CIVIL RIGHTS: These are "clean this place up" complaints Cause of Action: The reason that prisoners file. The primary reasons for civil rights suits: Internal Policies (28%) Original Case (19%) Violence (18%) Conditions (16%) Bill of Rights (8%) External Policies (6%) Other (5%) Reasons for the EXPANSION of prisoner litigation: 1) Civil rights struggles 2) changing notion of rights 3) public awareness of conditions 4) Black Muslims 5) External support groups 6) increased literacy of prisoners 7) Jailhouse lawyers Underlying rationale 1) punishment must be "least restrictive" 2) Rules are ok if there is a compelling state interest 3) Rules/policies/punishments are fine if there is clear and present danger Consequences of Litigation: 1) Social 2) Judicial 3) Prison administration 4) Prison existence Alternatives 1) Ombudsman 2) Grievance councils/procedures 3) Mediation 4) Fewer prisons and prisoners 5) More emphasis on scaled sentences
Page maintained by: Jim Thomas - jthomas@math.niu.edu