WALLACE AND WOLF
CHAPTER 1: THE UNDERSTANDING OF SOCIETY
Sociologists do not come to the subject matter cold,
their minds blank. Whatever the topic they approach the subject with
certain assumptions they emphasize particular methods and they have
particular questions that they want answered. This means that research is
based on ways of looking at things for sociological theories advance the
theories lay this out in an explicit and systematic way.
they noted that because of the differences in various theories sociological
theories may look like a group of perspectives with little in common
except their general and formalizing approach and their concern with
understanding human behavior. thing out the theories are made of concepts
A CONCEPT is a word or symbol that represents a phenomenon, or a label we
used to name and classify our perceptions and experiences, or an abstract
idea generalized from particular instances. Examples: Durkheim's cconcept
of anomie, or marx's concept of alienation are classic examples of
sociological concepts
Theories differ along several major dimensions:
FIRST, deductive and inductive approaches,
SECOND, methodologies
methodologies are simply how we gather our data. There are
different kinds of methodologies (list some)
THIRD, their subject matter
distinguish between macro sociology and microsociology.
(functionalism and conflict. Our two approaches concerned with
the overall characteristics of social structure and the general nature of
social institutions.
FOURTH, their assumptions underlying their approach
assumptions refer to the taken for granted characteristics about the
world and how it operates. For example theorists differ in whether they
view human behavior as essentially determined and so in principle
predictable, or whether they emphasize humans of creativity. The clearest
contrast is between, on the one hand, functionalism and series of rational
choice, and on the other symbolic interactionand phenomenology.
Functionalists Cedar world as built around individual motives but they see
human behavior has ultimately determined and so in principle easy to
explain or fully explainable. Symbolic interaction, on the other hand,
focuses on how people put together their social world.
Functionalists assumed more or less explicitly that people's motives and
behavior are largely a function of the social values they internalize. In
other words people's basic purposes are formed by their birth into a
particular society; they do not exist independently. Conflict theorists
like contrast emphasize interests, especially the interests of powerful
groups who impose them on less powerful groups.
FIFTH, types of questions they ask about the material.
TAKE A LOOK AT THE CHARTS, TABLE 1 -- ONE, ON PAGE 11.
OBJECTIVES
the final respect in which major perspectives in sociology deferred from
each other is in their ultimate objectives in particular whether they aim
at describing things at explaining things or at predicting things. ALL
THEORIES IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES LIKE THE SCIENCES, ARE CONCERNED WITH
INCREASING OUR COMPREHENSION OF THINGS WITH PROVIDING ACCOUNTS THAT MAKE
US FEEL THAT WE NOW UNDERSTAND WHAT IS GOING ON TO A GREATER DEGREE THAN
WE DID BEFORE.
The fact that sociological theory does not form a cumulative body of work
comparable to physics or even neoclassical economics does not mean that we
have an impasse with one approach merely contradicting another. The test
of the fairy is whether it helps us to understand and each of the theories
and discourse shed light on a different aspect of human behavior.
Page maintained by: Jim Thomas - jthomas@sun.soci.niu.edu