TEAM EXERCISE 6 (PART III) - Executing Juveniles

Points: Up to 15
Time frame: Thursday through Tuesday (May 4)

This is another debate. The first two parts addressed juveniles and
capital punishment. In this one, we will try to draw together some of
the things we've learned during the term and debate the issues of
executing juveniles.

From now until Weds, you will discuss IN YOUR TEAM AREAS some of the
issues below. Then, I will post a question about every 36 hours and
you will debate it (as a team). Up to 15 points will be given for the
quality of INDIVIDUAL participation. Up to five more will be presented to the
participating team members in the private areas.
The winning participating team members get an additional five points
(so, this is actually worth up to 25 points).


Teams A/B will take the DON'T EXECUTE JUVENILES position

Teams C/D will take the "Fry 'em"

Remember: It's not what you PERSONALLY believe, but rather how well you
can muster the issues and defend them.

Each of the three questions I pose will be based on the following three
questions. As you see, they are somewhat linear.


The following questions will appear as separate topics beginning
Thursday evening.

Question 1: Thursday through Friday midnight.
Question 2: Friday through Sunday.
Question 3: Sunday through tuesday.

1. Opposition to executing juveniles is based on a notion of "childhood"
that ends at age 18. Some people argue that this is appropriate, because by
18, we're physically and emotionally "adults." Others argue that
"childhood" is a social construct. Because we can execute "children" for
crimes committed as young as 16, the concept of childhood is an important
issue. 

Teams A/B: The "social construction" issue matters

Teams C/D: The "social construction issue does NOT matter - 18 is 18, period.

2. The history of executing juveniles shows that it's not been rare. 
Drawing from this history:

Teams A/B - the "history" should end

Teams C/D: We should recognize tradition - historical precedents are a guide,


3. Some say that there's something goofy (ie, illogical) about executing
a "child" for a crime committed as a child, but requiring them to reach
adulthood before actually executing them.

Teams A/B - yes, this is goofy

Teams C/D - no, it's not!

<--Return to JT's homepage

Page maintained by: Jim Thomas - jthomas@sun.soci.niu.edu