Supplemental Class Evaluations

In the belief that an instructor's accountability is critical to improving
departmental teaching, and in the belief that existing evaluation forms
don't include sufficient material to assess accountability, I generally
urge students to submit qualitative/open-ended feedback as a way of
trying to hold us (instructors) to the same high standards we expect
from students. For CRJ 540, I hope you will cooperate by answering
the following questions, print off your response, and give them to:
  Megan Reckers
  No later than next Thursday's class (Thursday, May 1)

She will collect them and give them to Professor Erez. Traditionally,
the Director (or Chair) shares pros/cons with the instructor to improve
future teaching, so your input, whether good or bad, matters!!
 
Do not sign your name, and be sure there is no identifying information
on the response.  

1. What did you like MOST about the class?


2. What did you like LEAST about the class?


3. How did the class fit within the substance of your other classes?
Was the material useful? Connected? 


4. What would you like to see eliminated or changed in this type of
graduate class?


5. What would you like to see retained in this type of graduate class?


6. What could the instructor do differently to improve your learning
experience?

Return to Jim Thomas's homepage

Page maintained by: Jim Thomas - jthomas@math.niu.edu