Here are the results from Exercise #5 - "soft on crime" debate that the teams submitted if people want to see how others did. Now: The next phase of the exercise is this: TEAMS A/B read TEAMS C/D material; TEAMS C/D read A/B material - Which team has its facts wrong? Which has the weakest argument that you can poke holes in? Discuss this among yourselves in your team areas and then come back and "debate" the other teams - simple opinions and "wanks" will lose points for the team.
REMEMBER - you can see what the other teams wrote for other exercises here
Page maintained by: Jim Thomas - jthomas@sun.soci.niu.edu