TOPIC: ARE YOUR INSTRUCTORS QUALIFIED? POINTS: Up to 10 DUE: Monday, September 20 at class time LENGTH: About four pages (850 words) In class, we discussed symbolic interactionism and especially Erving Goffman's concept of Dramaturgical Analyisis. Drawing from your notes and the text (check the index in Kendall) and take a look at the following: A summery of Dramaturgical concepts and skim the first few paragraphs (or more if you're ambitious) of this Wikipedia summary (NOTE: We normally *DO NOT* use Wikipedia as a source, but this is a decent summary and we'll make an exception just this once) Then, in ESSAY FORMAT (not point-by-point short answer): 1) Look up any three of your professors on the NIU or department homepage and look at their vita (mine is easy) 2) Then, drawing from class lecture, text, and reading, explain dramaturgical analysis 3) Then look at how we (your profs) "present ourselves" in a vita (or what you might call our resumes) and explain whether we're qualified to be be professors, how we "stage manage" our "performances" to emphasize our credibility, and whether the ways we manage it are credible (that is, believable) 4) Conclude you paper by summarizing how useful you think dramaturgy is for understanding how people (profs, students, whomever) maintain status, "self-identity" or anything else you think is important. 5) Finally, in a short paragraph, select one aspect of your own life and explain how you "stage manage" it.
Page maintained by: Jim Thomas - jthomas@math.niu.edu